Skip to content
YuktraOS · Modules

Seven purpose-built modules. One compliant AI core.

Every YuktraOS module shares the same cited reasoning, audit trail, e-signature, and validation pack. Turn them on individually, or run the full stack on-prem — the compliance story is identical.

YUKTRA IQ
SOP Intelligence

Your SOPs — cited, searchable,in the operator’s language.

Yuktra IQ parses every SOP, specification, and batch record into source-grounded, Part 11-compliant answers. No hallucinations. No out-of-date copies. No language barriers.

  • Ingests SOPs, specs, and batch records — no re-authoring
  • Answers operator questions in 18+ languages with citations
  • Writes a tamper-evident log for every interaction
QA Analyst · Line 4
What is the sampling plan for final-rinse conductivity after CIP on Line 4?
Yuktra IQ
Per SOP-CLN-204 §6.1: collect 3 samples at the final-rinse loop — start, middle, end. Accept if conductivity < 1.3 µS/cm at 25°C on all three. Record in BR-XX-XXXX.
SOP-CLN-204 · §6.1
Capabilities

Source-grounded answers

Every answer cites the exact SOP, section, and paragraph. If the content isn't indexed, Yuktra says so.

Multilingual input, validated output

Ask in Hindi, Marathi, Spanish, Mandarin — the answer cites the English SOP that remains the source of truth.

E-signed execution

When a step is executed from a Yuktra answer, an e-signature and comment are written to the audit trail.

Version-controlled content

New SOP approved? Yuktra flags superseded content, publishes the update, and pushes microlearning to affected roles.

Connector ecosystem

SharePoint, Documentum, Veeva Vault, TrackWise, MasterControl, SAP — index without copying files.

Part 11 by default

Audit trail, user attribution, e-signature and tamper-evidence enabled on day one. Validation pack included.

Use cases
Line-4 blister changeover
Operator needs the Product B → C changeover procedure at 2 a.m. on a Sunday shift.
Cited SOP section surfaced in 4 seconds. Execution e-signed. Audit trail written.
Raw-material release
QC analyst needs the specification limits for a new API batch.
Spec pulled with citation; analyst signs off on release with attached record.
Multilingual night shift
Hindi-speaking operator asks about cleaning verification on a mixer.
Answer in Hindi with citation to the validated English SOP-CLN-204.
SOP update rollout
QA publishes an updated CIP SOP affecting Lines 3 & 4.
Yuktra flags superseded content, pushes 90-second microlearning, tracks e-sign compliance.
YUKTRA EQ
Equipment Intelligence

OEM manuals — deployable on a single industrial PC at the line.

Yuktra EQ turns OEM manuals, schematics, and troubleshooting guides into an on-prem co-pilot for your equipment. Deflect Tier-1 support. Keep every byte inside the plant perimeter.

  • Ingests PDFs, schematics, CAD metadata — no cloud dependency
  • Troubleshooting with decision-tree guardrails
  • Back-feeds gaps to your OEM engineering team
Maintenance · Line 4
The blister wheel on IMA Adapta Line 4 is skipping. Where do I start?
Yuktra EQ
Run IMA diagnostic D-07 first — §12.3 of Operator Manual ADP-GA-12. Check wheel alignment per diagram F-12.4. If alignment OK, inspect drive belt tension before replacing wheel assembly.
ADP-GA-12 · §12.3
Capabilities

Troubleshooting with guardrails

Decision trees built from the manual ensure the operator never skips a safety step — and never gets an invented answer.

Single-PC, air-gapped deployment

Runs on one industrial PC at the line. No outbound network. Your data never leaves your perimeter.

Schematic & CAD awareness

Answers reference diagrams, part numbers, and assembly steps — with click-through to the underlying schematic.

Field-ticket deflection

80%+ of Tier-1 support questions resolved at the line. Engineers focus on the work only they can do.

SOP-gap back-feed

Repeated questions surface where manuals fall short — aggregate feedback to your OEM's engineering team.

Fast installation

Ship a preloaded industrial PC, connect to one ethernet port, live in 48 hours. Nothing else required.

Use cases
Blister-line jam diagnosis
Line operator hits a persistent jam on an IMA Adapta blister machine.
Step-by-step diagnosis with schematic references, safe stop procedure, and part-replacement SOP in 45 seconds.
Filler calibration
Annual recalibration on a high-speed filler — tech needs the OEM procedure.
Cited recalibration steps with torque specs and tolerance checks. E-signed on completion.
Post-maintenance restart
Maintenance tech needs the safe-restart sequence after a planned rebuild.
Pre-flight checklist, sensor verification, dry-run sequence — all cited, all logged.
OEM support escalation
Plant hits an issue that Yuktra can't resolve from the indexed manual.
Yuktra prepares a structured escalation packet with machine state, logs, and attempted steps.
YUKTRA QMS
Deviations · CAPA · Change Control

Capture the deviation. Draft the CAPA. Close the loop.

Yuktra QMS reads the deviation description, matches it to prior events, suggests root cause, and pre-populates a draft CAPA. Your QA team edits — never starts from a blank spreadsheet.

  • Pattern-matches deviations against 10,000+ prior events
  • Drafts CAPA from historical open and closed actions
  • Writes change control with full impact assessment
Deviation · DEV-2411-204
Draft CAPA ready
Mixer M-204 exceeded jacket-temp spec on batch BR-24-1108 at 18:42.
Severity
M2
Prior events
3
Batch linked
BR-24-1108
Draft CAPA-24-0442
Add redundant temp-probe verification on M-204 jacket loop. Re-train Line-2 night shift on alarm acknowledgement per SOP-MIX-204 §4.
Capabilities

Deviation intake in seconds

Voice-capture at the line. Yuktra classifies severity, pulls the batch record, and links to prior similar events.

Root-cause prompts

Ishikawa and 5-Why scaffolding, contextualized to the specific equipment, process step, and product.

CAPA draft, not CAPA blank

Draft pulls from prior closed actions on similar failures — your QA team edits the 20% that's new.

Change-control acceleration

Impact assessment writes itself from the linked SOPs, batches, and equipment. Reviewers see the full chain.

E-sign at every gate

Part 11 e-signature at submission, review, and closure. Nothing leaves a state without attribution.

Trend intelligence

See repeat patterns across lines, shifts, and products before they trigger an observation.

Use cases
Over-temperature deviation
Mixer M-204 exceeds jacket-temp spec on batch BR-24-1108.
Yuktra logs DEV-2411-204, matches to 3 prior events, drafts CAPA-24-0442. QA edits, not authors.
Repeat foreign-particle finding
In-process check finds particulate on the third batch this quarter.
Trend flag raised before the fourth batch. Root-cause review meeting pre-populated from prior investigations.
Cross-site deviation pattern
Two sites hit similar OOS results on related APIs.
Pattern surfaced at HQ dashboard; coordinated CAPA drafted across both sites.
Change-control review
Validation lead proposes a setpoint change to Line 3 CIP parameters.
Impact assessment auto-generated: linked SOPs, batches, deviations, training. Reviewers approve the package.
TRAININGOS
AI Microlearning

A 90-second module — the moment something changes.

TrainingOS generates role-scoped microlearning the instant an SOP updates or a deviation closes. Operators see it at their next login, e-sign on comprehension, and the audit trail writes itself.

  • Auto-generates microlearning from SOP updates and closed deviations
  • Role-scoped — only what's relevant to each operator
  • Part 11 e-signature on every completion
Microlearning · 00:48 / 01:30
CIP Final-Rinse · Rev. 12
Assigned 46 operators · Lines 3–4 · Night shift
Three new sampling points have been added to the final-rinse verification. Watch the 90-second module and confirm comprehension.
42 / 46 completed
E-sign to complete
Capabilities

Auto-authored microlearning

An SOP update or closed deviation yields a 90-second module — authored by Yuktra, reviewed by QA, assigned automatically.

Role and line scoping

Operators see only what's relevant to their line, role, and shift. No spam-training; no click-fatigue.

Comprehension checks

Every module ends with a short comprehension check. Fail the check and you re-train before the next shift.

E-signature on completion

Part 11 e-sign, timestamped, user-attributed. Your LMS is never the bottleneck again.

Compliance dashboards

Site, line, role, and shift views — see training debt before the audit does.

Multilingual delivery

Each operator sees the module in their preferred language, while the source of record stays validated in English.

Use cases
SOP CIP revision
QA publishes an updated cleaning SOP.
Affected roles see a 90-second module at next login; compliance dashboard tracks sign-off.
Post-deviation learning
A CAPA closes on a repeat over-temp event.
A targeted module is generated for that line's operators — trained within 24 hours of closure.
New-hire onboarding
Three new operators start on Line 2.
Role-scoped onboarding path cut from 14 weeks to 6 — measured by SOP-fluency assessment.
Audit preparation
External audit announced for next week.
Training debt dashboard highlights gaps by operator and SOP; bulk assignment closes them in hours.
On the roadmap

Three more modules extend the same compliant core deeper into the plant.

LabOS, ManufacturingOS, and SafetyOS inherit YuktraOS’s citation, audit, e-sign and validation by construction. Shipping plan targets H2 2026 → H1 2027.

LABOSRoadmapTarget · H2 2026
QC & Laboratory Intelligence

From test method to result review — with every data point audit-ready.

LabOS brings YuktraOS to QC benches and stability labs. Analysts interrogate test methods, pull spec limits, investigate OOS events, and draft analyst-reviewed reports — all cited back to the controlled method document.

  • Method-aware Q&A across compendial, in-house, and stability methods
  • OOS / OOT investigation scaffolding with decision-tree support
  • LIMS-integrated: Empower · LabWare · Sample Manager
Preview · OOS investigation
Assay result for Lot LOT-2601-B failed release spec: 92.1% (spec 95.0–105.0%).
LabOS · suggested path
Phase 1a: analyst & instrument review per SOP-QC-012 §3. Phase 1b: replicate injection from original vial. Prior similar OOS on this method: 2 cases, both instrument-related.
SOP-QC-012USP <621>Method M-045 v4
Planned capabilities

Method intelligence

Parse compendial, stability, and in-house methods into cited Q&A with step-level context.

OOS / OOT scaffolding

Phase-1a / 1b / 2 investigation flow, pre-populated from SOP-QC and prior similar events.

LIMS integration

Empower, LabWare, Sample Manager — read result/sample context, write investigation records.

Data-integrity by default

ALCOA+ alignment: attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate — and complete.

Stability cockpit

Trend chamber, time-point, and lot data; surface early drift before spec breach.

Analyst-language input

Ask in the lab's working language; the answer cites the validated English method.

Target scenarios
Assay OOS investigation
HPLC assay fails release spec on a commercial lot.
LabOS opens phase-1a, pulls method SOP, links prior investigations, drafts analyst checklist.
Stability protocol drafting
New product enters ICH stability at 25°C/60% and 40°C/75%.
Protocol and pull-schedule drafted from the approved CMC and prior similar products.
Method transfer readiness
Analytical method transferring from R&D to QC at a new site.
LabOS compares methods, surfaces gaps, pre-populates transfer protocol per USP <1224>.
Chromatography peak review
System suitability fails on a stability pull.
Step-by-step troubleshooting cited to the method, with equipment qualification history.
MANUFACTURINGOSRoadmapTarget · H2 2026
Batch & Shop-Floor Intelligence

From batch record to real-time release — one intelligent layer over MES.

ManufacturingOS sits above your MES and historian to answer real-time production questions: batch progress, yield, cycle time, cleaning-verification status, and changeover readiness — cited to the controlling recipe and master batch record.

  • Real-time batch-record awareness on PAS-X, POMSnet, Werum
  • Process-historian queries: OSIsoft PI, AspenTech, Canary
  • Golden-batch comparison and deviation-to-yield correlation
Batch · BR-26-0418
On-track · step 12 / 26
Yield vs. golden
+1.3%
Cycle
11h 42m
Deviations
0
ManufacturingOS · insight
Granulation endpoint is trending 4 minutes earlier than golden batch median. Within spec — logged for continuous-verification trend.
Planned capabilities

Live batch awareness

Ask where a batch is, why it paused, or what's next — cited to the master recipe and current record.

Golden-batch comparison

Overlay current-batch trajectory on the golden batch; flag divergences before they breach spec.

Historian-native

OSIsoft PI, AspenTech IP.21, Canary — query time-series with natural language.

Changeover readiness

Cleaning, line-clearance, calibration, operator-training state — all in one answer.

Real-time release support

Pull critical quality attributes and process parameters into review-by-exception batch release.

GxP-grade by construction

Same audit trail, e-sign, validation pack as every other YuktraOS module.

Target scenarios
Shift handover
Incoming supervisor needs the state of all active batches in one view.
Narrative handover auto-drafted with yield, exceptions, and upcoming critical steps.
Yield-loss investigation
Yield drops 2% on Line 3 over the last 5 batches.
Historian correlation surfaces a gradual granulator-amperage drift — linked to upcoming PM.
Continuous-verification trend
Process-capability report due for annual product review.
Draft APR assembled from live historian data and deviation log; QA reviews, not assembles.
Line changeover
Product A to Product B on a primary packaging line.
Sequenced cleaning, line-clearance, and calibration status — gates held until all green.
SAFETYOSRoadmapTarget · H1 2027
EHS, Pharmacovigilance & Site Safety

Bring the same compliant memory to EHS and pharmacovigilance.

SafetyOS extends YuktraOS into site EHS and post-market safety: incident capture, near-miss trending, PSUR/PBRER scaffolding, signal-detection support, and hazard / SDS lookups at the point of use.

  • Near-miss and incident capture with SDS-aware triage
  • Pharmacovigilance signal scaffolding with cited literature
  • Periodic-report drafting: PSUR, PBRER, DSUR
Incident · INC-26-0082
Preview
Operator reports minor skin exposure to API intermediate during transfer on Line 2.
Hazard
OEL Band 3 · skin sensitizer
SDS section
§4.2 · First aid
SafetyOS · response
Occupational-medicine notification drafted. Near-miss pattern check vs. 12-month Line-2 transfers: 2 prior events — trend flag raised for EHS review.
Planned capabilities

Incident intake

Voice capture at the line — classified by severity, hazard class, OEL band, and body system involved.

SDS-aware answers

Every answer cites the active SDS revision; outdated sheets are flagged and removed.

Near-miss trending

Pattern detection across lines and shifts; surface precursors before a recordable incident.

PV signal scaffolding

Aggregate post-market cases, cite literature, support signal-detection reviews with traceable logic.

Periodic reports

PSUR / PBRER / DSUR structure and cross-reference; humans review, don't assemble.

Audit-ready logs

Every triage, every classification, every narrative — attributed, timestamped, exportable.

Target scenarios
Minor exposure event
Operator reports skin contact with an intermediate on Line 2.
Triage with SDS §4, occ-med notification drafted, trend flag if precursors exist.
Spill response
Solvent spill in a weigh-out suite.
SDS-aware containment steps, escalation matrix, incident log started — all cited.
PSUR drafting
PSUR due for a commercial product in 4 weeks.
Structure and cross-reference drafted from the case log; MAH reviews, doesn't assemble.
Signal-detection review
Quarterly review of post-market adverse-event cases.
Proposed signals with cited literature, case counts, and MedDRA coding rationale.

Want to see the full stack on your SOPs & manuals?

We’ll index a small corpus (10–50 documents), wire up a demo plant, and run cited queries against your own content.

Request a demo